<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: While most of the questions submitted to Ask the Geeks are related to waiver pic&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ffgeekblog.com/advice/while-most-of-the-questions-submitted-to-ask-the-geeks-are-related-to-waiver-pic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ffgeekblog.com/advice/while-most-of-the-questions-submitted-to-ask-the-geeks-are-related-to-waiver-pic/</link>
	<description>Fantasy football from a geekier perspective. Player news, rankings and advice along with commentary on the websites and innovations that drive the world of fantasy football.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 10:21:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squish</title>
		<link>http://www.ffgeekblog.com/advice/while-most-of-the-questions-submitted-to-ask-the-geeks-are-related-to-waiver-pic/comment-page-1/#comment-31786</link>
		<dc:creator>Squish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ffgeekblog.com/advice/while-most-of-the-questions-submitted-to-ask-the-geeks-are-related-to-waiver-pic/#comment-31786</guid>
		<description>I like Maroney, Bush, and Charles this week better than any of the WRs. They all have great matchups and should have considerably more consistent scoring than Maclin and Wallace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Maroney, Bush, and Charles this week better than any of the WRs. They all have great matchups and should have considerably more consistent scoring than Maclin and Wallace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sal</title>
		<link>http://www.ffgeekblog.com/advice/while-most-of-the-questions-submitted-to-ask-the-geeks-are-related-to-waiver-pic/comment-page-1/#comment-31781</link>
		<dc:creator>sal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ffgeekblog.com/advice/while-most-of-the-questions-submitted-to-ask-the-geeks-are-related-to-waiver-pic/#comment-31781</guid>
		<description>i would go with - mac attack, bush, and maroney against a bad run D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i would go with &#8211; mac attack, bush, and maroney against a bad run D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.ffgeekblog.com/advice/while-most-of-the-questions-submitted-to-ask-the-geeks-are-related-to-waiver-pic/comment-page-1/#comment-31779</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ffgeekblog.com/advice/while-most-of-the-questions-submitted-to-ask-the-geeks-are-related-to-waiver-pic/#comment-31779</guid>
		<description>i feel like i have to pick between poop but i need to pick the best of poop here.....i&#039;ve got mike wallace, shonn green, larence maroney, jeremy maclin, reggie bush, jamal charles...i need to pick three of them...any advice? thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i feel like i have to pick between poop but i need to pick the best of poop here&#8230;..i&#8217;ve got mike wallace, shonn green, larence maroney, jeremy maclin, reggie bush, jamal charles&#8230;i need to pick three of them&#8230;any advice? thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mal</title>
		<link>http://www.ffgeekblog.com/advice/while-most-of-the-questions-submitted-to-ask-the-geeks-are-related-to-waiver-pic/comment-page-1/#comment-31767</link>
		<dc:creator>Mal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ffgeekblog.com/advice/while-most-of-the-questions-submitted-to-ask-the-geeks-are-related-to-waiver-pic/#comment-31767</guid>
		<description>Forte Jacobs is going to the commisioner- do you think it will get approved?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forte Jacobs is going to the commisioner- do you think it will get approved?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mal</title>
		<link>http://www.ffgeekblog.com/advice/while-most-of-the-questions-submitted-to-ask-the-geeks-are-related-to-waiver-pic/comment-page-1/#comment-31759</link>
		<dc:creator>Mal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ffgeekblog.com/advice/while-most-of-the-questions-submitted-to-ask-the-geeks-are-related-to-waiver-pic/#comment-31759</guid>
		<description>Ah I forgot about the Thursday game! I&#039;m not affected HOWEVER it makes sense why my Jacobs-Forte trade was accepted (the 24 hours would allow for Forte to be still in his team for the game) although i&#039;m not sure if that&#039;s a bad thing. I know you guys did recommend keeping Jacobs, but splitting carries with Bradshaw is a killer + it is becoming more and more apparent that they are going to Bradshaw for the goal line carries- at least Forte is a definite.

RB: Betts or Cad Williams? (Jacobs on bye)

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah I forgot about the Thursday game! I&#8217;m not affected HOWEVER it makes sense why my Jacobs-Forte trade was accepted (the 24 hours would allow for Forte to be still in his team for the game) although i&#8217;m not sure if that&#8217;s a bad thing. I know you guys did recommend keeping Jacobs, but splitting carries with Bradshaw is a killer + it is becoming more and more apparent that they are going to Bradshaw for the goal line carries- at least Forte is a definite.</p>
<p>RB: Betts or Cad Williams? (Jacobs on bye)</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
