<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guest Post: Week 14 WR Fantasy Football Rankings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ffgeekblog.com/advice/week-14-wr-fantasy-football-rankings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ffgeekblog.com/advice/week-14-wr-fantasy-football-rankings/</link>
	<description>Fantasy football from a geekier perspective. Player news, start/sit advice and all that good stuff, plus reviews and commentary on the technology and websites that power the world of fantasy football.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:07:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.ffgeekblog.com/advice/week-14-wr-fantasy-football-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-13651</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 14:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ffgeekblog.com/?p=979#comment-13651</guid>
		<description>Yes, Bryant had a ridiculous game. He&#039;s actually a solid play again as Tampa will have to pass in order to beat the Falcons on their home field.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Bryant had a ridiculous game. He&#8217;s actually a solid play again as Tampa will have to pass in order to beat the Falcons on their home field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e-roc</title>
		<link>http://www.ffgeekblog.com/advice/week-14-wr-fantasy-football-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-13650</link>
		<dc:creator>e-roc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 13:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ffgeekblog.com/?p=979#comment-13650</guid>
		<description>So the correct answer was Antonio Bryant, Brandon Marshall and Anquan Boldin...  Bryant went for 56 points in our league.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the correct answer was Antonio Bryant, Brandon Marshall and Anquan Boldin&#8230;  Bryant went for 56 points in our league.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.ffgeekblog.com/advice/week-14-wr-fantasy-football-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-13367</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 00:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ffgeekblog.com/?p=979#comment-13367</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t play Romo. It looks like Barber will have to sit and Pittsburgh will destroy this offense if made one dimensional. It&#039;ll also be 30 degrees or below. 

The defense is a bit more tricky. If Steven Jackson has a big role in the game, I don&#039;t think the Rams will be as anemic as they&#039;ve been. And for the Ravens, with Portis a non-factor even if he plays, they should be able to make life miserable for Campbell and the weather should be a factor too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t play Romo. It looks like Barber will have to sit and Pittsburgh will destroy this offense if made one dimensional. It&#8217;ll also be 30 degrees or below. </p>
<p>The defense is a bit more tricky. If Steven Jackson has a big role in the game, I don&#8217;t think the Rams will be as anemic as they&#8217;ve been. And for the Ravens, with Portis a non-factor even if he plays, they should be able to make life miserable for Campbell and the weather should be a factor too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shirley</title>
		<link>http://www.ffgeekblog.com/advice/week-14-wr-fantasy-football-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-13364</link>
		<dc:creator>Shirley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 00:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ffgeekblog.com/?p=979#comment-13364</guid>
		<description>QB:  Romo or Thigpen?  Even though it&#039;s Romo, he&#039;s playing the Steelers and so I&#039;m leaning toward Thigpen right now.
DEF:  BAL (v. PHI) or ARI (v. STL)?  The Ravens typically get more sacks and INTs than the Cardinals but the Cardinals are going up against the Rams...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>QB:  Romo or Thigpen?  Even though it&#8217;s Romo, he&#8217;s playing the Steelers and so I&#8217;m leaning toward Thigpen right now.<br />
DEF:  BAL (v. PHI) or ARI (v. STL)?  The Ravens typically get more sacks and INTs than the Cardinals but the Cardinals are going up against the Rams&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.ffgeekblog.com/advice/week-14-wr-fantasy-football-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-13279</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ffgeekblog.com/?p=979#comment-13279</guid>
		<description>Yes, pass a rule that week 13 is the cut-off date. That will help solve any problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, pass a rule that week 13 is the cut-off date. That will help solve any problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.ffgeekblog.com/advice/week-14-wr-fantasy-football-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-13278</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ffgeekblog.com/?p=979#comment-13278</guid>
		<description>Yes - without going into great detail its difficult to describe our keeper format.

We just wanted to pass a rule that would prevent non-playoff teams from making unwarranted roster moves during the playoffs.

I was just curious if other keeper leagues had similar rules that &quot;froze&quot; the rosters at a certain point during the season to prevent this problem.

Thanks for the advice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes &#8211; without going into great detail its difficult to describe our keeper format.</p>
<p>We just wanted to pass a rule that would prevent non-playoff teams from making unwarranted roster moves during the playoffs.</p>
<p>I was just curious if other keeper leagues had similar rules that &#8220;froze&#8221; the rosters at a certain point during the season to prevent this problem.</p>
<p>Thanks for the advice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.ffgeekblog.com/advice/week-14-wr-fantasy-football-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-13277</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ffgeekblog.com/?p=979#comment-13277</guid>
		<description>Your question is a bit confusing but I think that all keepers for the following year should come from week 13 and before. Once the playoffs begin, it&#039;s another season and those players should be exempt from the keepers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your question is a bit confusing but I think that all keepers for the following year should come from week 13 and before. Once the playoffs begin, it&#8217;s another season and those players should be exempt from the keepers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.ffgeekblog.com/advice/week-14-wr-fantasy-football-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-13274</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ffgeekblog.com/?p=979#comment-13274</guid>
		<description>I have a keeper league format question:  This is our first year in the keeper league and we discover new unanticipated situations frequently.

In our league we are able to keep 3 players from the previous draft&#039;s rounds 1-10 (Regular Players) and 2 players from the previous drafts rounds 11-17 (Wildcard Players).  FAs or Waiver Wire pickups act as your 17th round pick.  Regular players are kept as 1st, 2nd, or 3rd rd picks the following year.  Wildcard players are kept in the rounds you drafted them.  Our regular season ended week 13.  

Owner A (did not make the playoffs) is dropping half of his team and picking up anyone and everyone he may think will serve as a Wildcard player.  He currently has no defense or kicker.  Many owners believe this is cheap and unfair.  Do you believe setting a rule that &quot;freezes&quot; EVERY roster for keeper purposes at the conclusion of week 13 is appropriate?  Playoffs team would still be able to make transactions but would be unable to keep new pick ups.

Sorry for the length -- I appreciate comments -- Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a keeper league format question:  This is our first year in the keeper league and we discover new unanticipated situations frequently.</p>
<p>In our league we are able to keep 3 players from the previous draft&#8217;s rounds 1-10 (Regular Players) and 2 players from the previous drafts rounds 11-17 (Wildcard Players).  FAs or Waiver Wire pickups act as your 17th round pick.  Regular players are kept as 1st, 2nd, or 3rd rd picks the following year.  Wildcard players are kept in the rounds you drafted them.  Our regular season ended week 13.  </p>
<p>Owner A (did not make the playoffs) is dropping half of his team and picking up anyone and everyone he may think will serve as a Wildcard player.  He currently has no defense or kicker.  Many owners believe this is cheap and unfair.  Do you believe setting a rule that &#8220;freezes&#8221; EVERY roster for keeper purposes at the conclusion of week 13 is appropriate?  Playoffs team would still be able to make transactions but would be unable to keep new pick ups.</p>
<p>Sorry for the length &#8212; I appreciate comments &#8212; Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.ffgeekblog.com/advice/week-14-wr-fantasy-football-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-13267</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ffgeekblog.com/?p=979#comment-13267</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re looking good for the playoffs... Keep an eye on the weather, but I see Hixon getting at least 70 yards in this game and possibly a TD. Marshall might come back but opposing teams have been focusing more attention his way and that&#039;s why his numbers have been down of late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re looking good for the playoffs&#8230; Keep an eye on the weather, but I see Hixon getting at least 70 yards in this game and possibly a TD. Marshall might come back but opposing teams have been focusing more attention his way and that&#8217;s why his numbers have been down of late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E-roc</title>
		<link>http://www.ffgeekblog.com/advice/week-14-wr-fantasy-football-rankings/comment-page-1/#comment-13263</link>
		<dc:creator>E-roc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 16:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ffgeekblog.com/?p=979#comment-13263</guid>
		<description>Our league set-up requires 2 RB, 3 WR and 1 TE. We don&#039;t have a flex position.... The forecast looks better in Denver than NY/NJ.

I&#039;ve been playing running back roulette all season because I failed to snag a good RB in the draft (not even a Michael Turner, Matt Forte or Chris Johnson!). I&#039;m sitting on Slaton &amp; Hillis with Pierre Thomas &amp; L-Wash.  I wish I had better options, but I can&#039;t really complain with a Bye week this week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our league set-up requires 2 RB, 3 WR and 1 TE. We don&#8217;t have a flex position&#8230;. The forecast looks better in Denver than NY/NJ.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been playing running back roulette all season because I failed to snag a good RB in the draft (not even a Michael Turner, Matt Forte or Chris Johnson!). I&#8217;m sitting on Slaton &amp; Hillis with Pierre Thomas &amp; L-Wash.  I wish I had better options, but I can&#8217;t really complain with a Bye week this week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
